Financial Performance of Cement Industry
P. Chandrasekar1
and Dr. S. Ramanath2
1Research Scholar, P.G. and Research
Department of Commerce, National College (Autonomous), Trichy,
Tamil Nadu, India.
2Associate Professor, P.G. and Research
Department of Commerce, National College (Autonomous), Trichy,
Tamil Nadu, India.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: pcsekar1958@gmail.com
India is the second largest
producer of cement in the world. The production of cement in India has
increased at a compound annual growth rate of 9.7 per cent to reach 272 million
tones in the period 2006–2013. It is expected to
touch 407 million tones by 2020.The globally-competitive
cement industry in India continues to witness positive trends such as cost
control, continuous technology up gradation and increased construction
activities.
With the best limestone deposit
an available it is able to produce the high quality cement of various grades
and supplies government department and public.
Wide application has been received from various quarters for its ARASU
brand cement being marketed in Tamil Nadu and Kerala. Capacity enhancement at Ariyalur
factory is also proposed of late it operated exceedingly well producing more
than its capacity.
The comparative statement
analysis to the Tamil Nadu Cement Corporation Limited in analysis to that
concern will be process in profitability or not. So the comparative balance sheet is prepared
in the compared with previous years. Every company followed to the particular
process or method will be every financial year.
So the company changes with our production method and marketing style. So the company earnings to the profit in
future year. This every year the company
followed to the benefit of the process.
INTRODUCTION:
Early, millions of Indian stays to find their buildings. Across
the country, building construction using important things cement. In production of cement and cement based
products and primarily cater to the needs of government departments. Limestone being the main raw material, the
company acquired and researched enough limestone bearing land in and around Alangulam and Ariyalur which are
sufficient to run the cement plants for decoders to come hence the role of
Tamil Nadu cement corporation Limited (TANCEM) in the development of state is
in immense.
Furthermore, major cement manufacturers in India are progressively
using other alternatives such as bio energy as fuel for their furnace. This is
not only helping to bring down production costs of cement companies, but is
also proving effective in reducing emissions. With the ever-increasing
industrial activities, real estate, construction and infrastructure, in
addition to the various Special Economic Zones being developed across the country,
there is a demand for cement
Ariyalur is one of the districts in
Tamil Nadu state. It is rich in limestone resources. Big industrial houses like
Birlas (Grasim Industries), India cement, Dalmia cement, and Madras cement have their cement units here.
Tamil Nadu government’s TANCEM factory is in Ariyalur.
Elakurichi is an important tourist place.
Five major cement factories in the district reveal the abundant of
deposit of limestone. The availability of lignite at Jayankondam
and nearby places is a gift by Mother Nature. The fossil is said to have been a
national asset according to geologists.
THE CEMENT CITY
Ariyalur is famous for its cement
industries in and around it. This is possible due to its immense limestone
store which is the potential raw material for cement industries. In particular
the Arasu cements, the Birla cements, the Sakthi cements, the Ramco
cements, etc. are situated in Ariyalur. So Ariyalur is one of the busiest transport cities.
PROFILE OF THE ORGANISATION
The TANCEM was established in Feb’ 1976 as a wholly, owned
subsidiary of TIDCO. Future, all the shares were transferred to Government of
Tamil Nadu and now functioning under the control of industries Department. The
corporation is headed by the Chairman cum Managing Director and IAS official.
TANCEM owns two cement units, one at Alangulam
and another one at Ariyalur. In addition to cement
units, TANCEM is having one Asbestos sheet unit at Alangulam,
and stoneware pipe unit at Virudhachalam.
TANCEM’s corporate office is functioning at 735, Annasalai, Chennai-2. TANCEM’s Ariyalur
unit was commissioned on 1st August 1979 and commercial production
commenced on 9th September 1979. This Ariyalur
unit is having two kilns of 750 TPD capacities each and production clinker of
1500 Metric Tones per day in total. The Brand Name is
Arasu Cement. Now, TANCEM Ariyalur
unit has installed additional ESP at a total cost of RS.3.00crores for
controlling the dust emission as per the norms of Tamil Nadu pollution control
Board.
The cement produced in this plant is stacked in four cement silos
and fed to packing plant from where the same is packed with the help of
Electronics packer for meeting out the dispatch program me in a steam lined
manner to maintain correct weight which meets the customer satisfaction. The unit is producing three kinds of cement
OPC (53 Grade), OPC (43 Grade), and PPC. Cement is dispatched through Railway
(Board Gauge) and Road movements.
Tamilnadu cement corporation (TANCEM), a
wholly owned Government of Tamilnadu undertaking,
started business from 1st April 1976 with an authorized share
capital of Rs.10crores taking over cement plant at Alangulam
and setting up another plant at Ariyalur in the year
1979.
TANCEM, as its expansion and conversion activities, set up
Asbestos Sheet unit at Alangulam during 1981 and an
Asbestos pressure pipe plant at Mayanur during 1983.
TANCEM also took over during 1989, a stoneware pipe plant from TACEL with a
view to provide employment to the retrenched employees.
It is estimated that the country
requires about US$ 1 trillion in the period FY 2012-13 to FY 2016-17 to fund
infrastructure such as ports, airports and highways to boost growth, which
promises a good scope for the cement industry.
India's potential in
infrastructure is vast. It has the capacity to become the world's third largest
construction market by 2025, adding 11.5 million homes a year to become a US$ 1
trillion a year market, according to a study by Global Construction
Perspectives and Oxford Economics. This opens up a tremendous window of
opportunity for the country’s cement industry.
MARKET SIZE
The Indian cement sector is
expected to witness positive growth in the coming years, with demand set to
increase at a CAGR of more than 8 per cent in the period FY 2013-14 to FY
2015-16, according to the latest report titled ‘Indian Cement Industry Outlook
2016’ by market research consulting firm RNCOS. The report further observed
that India’s southern region is creating the maximum demand for cement, which
is expected to increase more in future.
The cement and gypsum products
sector has attracted foreign direct investments (FDI) worth US$ 2,656.29
million in the period April 2000–August 2013, according to data published by
the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP).
CEMENT PRODUCTION AND GROWTH
Domestic demand plays a major role in the fast growth of cement
industry in India. In fact the domestic demand of cement has surpassed the
economic growth rate of India. The cement consumption is expected to rise more
than 22% by 2010-11 from 2008-09. In cement consumption, the state of
Maharashtra leads the table with 12.18% consumption, followed by Uttar Pradesh.
In terms of cement production, Andhra Pradesh leads the list with 14.72% of
production, while Rajasthan remains at second position.
The production of cement in India grew at a rate of 9.1% during
2007-2008 against the total production of 147.8 MT in the previous fiscal year.
During April to October 2009-2010, the production of cement in India was 101.04
MT comparing to 95.05 MT during the same period in the previous year. During
October 2010, the total cement production in India was 12.37 MT compared to a
production of 11.61 MT in the same month in the previous year. The cement
companies are also increasing their productions due to the high market demand.
The cement companies have seen a net profit growth rate of 85%. With this huge
success, the cement industry in India has contributed almost 8% to India’s
economic development.
·
Prism Cement Ltd has become the first Indian company to get the
Quality Council of India's (QCI) certification for its ready-mix concrete (RMC)
plant in Kochi, Kerala. The company received the certification
from Institute for Certification
and Quality Mark (ICQM), a leading Italian certification body authorised to oversee QCI compliance.
·
UltraTech Cement, an Aditya
Birla Group Company, has acquired the 4.8 million tonne
per annum (MTPA) Gujarat unit of Jaypee Cement Corp
for Rs 3,800 crore (US$ 595.61 million).
·
ACC Ltd plans to invest Rs 3,000 crore
(US$ 470.22 million) to expand its capacity by nearly 4 MT a year in three
eastern region states, over the next three years.
·
Reliance Cements Co Pvt Ltd will set up
a 3 MTPA grinding unit at an estimated cost of Rs 600 crore
(US$ 94.04 million). The unit is likely to come up at Raghunathpur
in Purulia, West Bengal.
·
Reliance Cement Co, a special purpose vehicle (SPV) of Reliance
Infrastructure Ltd, is commissioning its first 5 MTPA plant in Madhya Pradesh.
The project has been implemented at a cost of approximately Rs 3,000 crore (US$ 470.22 million).
·
Zuari Cement plans to set up a cement
grinding unit at Auj (Aherwadi)
and Shingadgaon villages in Solapur,
Maharashtra. The new unit will have a production capacity of 1 MTPA and is
expected to be operational by the second quarter of 2015.
·
JSW Steel has acquired Heidelberg Cement India's 0.6 MTPA cement
grinding facility in Raigad, Maharashtra, for an
undisclosed amount.
References: Media Reports,
India in Business, Cement Corporation of India, Department of Industrial Policy
and Promotion (DIPP), Cement Manufacturers Association (CMA)
ARIYALUR CEMENT WORKS
Commercial production in this unit was commenced during September
1979. Set up with a capital outlay of Rs.29crore and a rated capacity of 5lakh
tones per annum of cement, this unit provides direct employment for 1000
employees.
With the best limestone deposit available, it is able to produce
the high quality cement of various grades and supplies to Government
Departments and Public. Wide appreciations have been received from various
people for its ARASU brand cement being marketed in Tamil Nadu and Kerala.
Capacity enhancement at Ariyalur factory is also
proposed. Of late, it operates exceedingly well, producing more than its
capacity.
ALANGULAM CEMENT WORKS
Alangulam in Virudhunagar
District, Commercial production was commenced in 1970-71 with capital outlay of
Rs.6.66 crores. With the rated capacity of 4lakh
tones per annum, this unit provides direct employment to 1600 people and
indirect employment to 3000 people. The unit manufactures and markets ARASU 53
Grade, 43 Grade, OPC cement in Tamil Nadu and Kerala. Major consumption is by
Government Department for their construction activities such as Bridges, Dams,
and High raised Multistory Buildings etc. It has a wide network of stockiest
both in Tamilnadu and Kerala. Modernization of plant
is on.
OBJECTIVES
OF THE STUDY:
§ To study the comparative
Statement analysis with reference to Tamil Nadu Cement Corporation Limited, Ariyalur.
§ To measure the efficiency of the
company for the upcoming years.
§ To study the relationship
between different financial variables effecting the solvency and
profitability’s position of the company.
§ To know the effective
utilization of old funds.
§ Correlating the change in working
capital with respect to the worth of the company.
§ To compare the financial
position of various years of the company (2006 – 2007 to 2010 – 2011).
RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY:
Research is an art of scientific investigation. It is a scientific and systematic search for
pertinent on a specific topic.
TOOLS
USED IN THE DATA ANALYSIS:
The following tools are used for the purpose of analyzing the
comparative statement analysis is as follows.
·
Comparative Balance Sheet
DATA
COLLECTION METHOD
This study is purely based on the secondary data. The data was collected from the published
financial reports for the six year from the March 31st 2006 – 2007
to 2010 – 2011.
ANALYSIS
RESEARCH
This objective of this research is to use the available
information and analyze the information to make a critical evaluation of the
material. In this study the data is
available in the company annual report and websites.
LIMITATIONS
OF THE STUDY
ü Tamil Nadu Cement Corporation
Limited being a large concern the entire financial data could not be covered in
a limited period.
ü It is very hard to know the
entire financial analysis/statement is followed in Tamil Nadu Cement
Corporation Limited.
ü Due to time and cost Constrains,
the study was limited to Ariyalur District.
ü The data collected for the study
was totally an integral nature.
Comparative Balance Sheet as on 31st March 2006-2007
|
PARTICULARS |
2006 |
2007 |
INC/ DEC |
% |
|
SOURCES OF FUNDS: |
||||
|
1.SHAREHOLDERS FUND |
|
|
|
|
|
A.
Reserves and surplus |
748719183 |
788033825 |
(+)39314642 |
(+)52.50 |
|
Less:
I O G |
479641441 |
510692320 |
(+)31050879 |
(+)06.47 |
|
Total |
269077742 |
277341505 |
(+)8263763 |
(+)03.07 |
|
2.LOANS FUNDS |
|
|
|
|
|
A.
Secured Loans |
8524800 |
4524800 |
(+)4000000 |
(+)46.92 |
|
B.
Unsecured Loans |
524724554 |
524724554 |
|
|
|
3.DEFERRED
TAX LIABILITY |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Total
Loans fund |
533249354 |
529249354 |
(-)4000000 |
(-)00.75 |
|
TOTAL |
802327096 |
806590859 |
(+)4263713 |
(+)00.53 |
|
APPLICATION OF FUNDS |
||||
|
1.FIXED ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
A.
Grass Block |
680210090 |
669681543 |
(-)10528547 |
(-)01.55 |
|
B.
Less: Depreciation |
429442857 |
433697437 |
(+)4254580 |
(+)00.99 |
|
C. Net
Block |
250767233 |
235984106 |
(-)14783127 |
(-)00.58 |
|
D.
Capital work-in-progress |
26974725 |
27493558 |
(+)518833 |
(+)01.92 |
|
Total Fixed Assets |
277741958 |
263477664 |
(-)14264294 |
(-)05.13 |
|
2.CURRENT ASSETS, LOANS AND ADVANCES |
|
|
|
|
|
A.
Inventories |
98297716 |
97081130 |
(-)1216586 |
(-)12.37 |
|
B.
Sundry Debtors |
498284139 |
462678006 |
(-)35606133 |
(-)71.45 |
|
C.
Cash and Bank balance |
61713901 |
108892902 |
(+)47179001 |
(+)76.44 |
|
D.
Loan and Advance |
84955796 |
87644384 |
(+)2688588 |
(+)31.64 |
|
E.
Other Current Assets |
4025663 |
4122100 |
(+)96497 |
(+)23.97 |
|
Total Current Assets |
747277215 |
760418522 |
(+)13141307 |
(+)23.97 |
|
Less:
Total Current Liabilities and Provision |
224723108 |
218087141 |
(-)6635967 |
(-)02.95 |
|
Total |
522554107 |
542331381 |
(+)19777274 |
(+)03.78 |
|
3.
Outstanding Expenses (miscellany exp) |
2031031 |
781814 |
(-)1249217 |
(-)61.50 |
|
TOTAL |
802327096 |
806590859 |
(+)4263713 |
(+)00.53 |
Comparative Balance Sheet as on 31st March 2007-2008
|
PARTICULARS |
2007 |
2008 |
INC / DEC |
% |
|
SOURCES OF FUNDS: |
||||
|
1.SHAREHOLDERS FUND |
|
|
|
|
|
A.
Reserves and surplus |
788033825 |
924853467 |
(+)136819642 |
(+)17.36 |
|
Less:
I O G |
510692320 |
667117341 |
(+)156425021 |
(+)30.63 |
|
Total |
277341505 |
257736126 |
(+)19605379 |
(-)07.07 |
|
2.LOANS FUNDS |
|
|
|
|
|
A.
Secured Loans |
4524800 |
0 |
(-)4524800 |
0 |
|
B.
Unsecured Loans |
524724554 |
524724554 |
0 |
0 |
|
3.DEFERRED TAX LIABILITY |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Total
Loans fund |
529249354 |
524724554 |
(-)4524800 |
(-)00.85 |
|
TOTAL |
806590859 |
782460680 |
(-)24130179 |
(-)03.00 |
|
APPLICATION OF FUNDS |
||||
|
1.FIXED ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
A.
Grass Block |
669681543 |
670717131 |
(+)1035588 |
(+)00.15 |
|
B.
Less: Depreciation |
433697437 |
448163935 |
(+)14466498 |
(+)03.33 |
|
C.
Net Block |
235984106 |
2225533196 |
(-)13430910 |
(-)05.69 |
|
D.
Capital work-in-progress |
27493558 |
35904882 |
(+)8411324 |
(+)30.59 |
|
Total Fixed Assets |
263477664 |
258458078 |
(-)5019586 |
(-)01.91 |
|
2.CURRENT ASSETS, LOANS AND ADVANCES |
|
|
|
|
|
A.
Inventories |
97081130 |
122128776 |
(+)25047646 |
(+)25.80 |
|
B.
Sundry Debtors |
462678006 |
429647827 |
(-)33030179 |
(-)07.14 |
|
C.
Cash and Bank balance |
108892902 |
120426620 |
(+)11533718 |
(+)10.59 |
|
D.
Loan and Advance |
87644384 |
113997847 |
(+)26353463 |
(+)30.06 |
|
E.
Other Current Assets |
4122100 |
0 |
(-)4122100 |
0 |
|
Total Current Assets |
760418522 |
786201070 |
(+)25782548 |
(+)03.39 |
|
Less:
Total Current Liabilities and Provision |
218087141 |
262327735 |
(+)44240594 |
(+)20.29 |
|
Total |
542331381 |
523873335 |
(-)18458046 |
(-)03.40 |
|
3.
Outstanding Expenses (miscellany exp) |
781814 |
129267 |
(-)652547 |
(-)83.46 |
|
TOTAL |
806590859 |
782460680 |
(-)24130179 |
(-)03.00 |
Comparative Balance Sheet as on 31st March 2008-2009
|
PARTICULARS |
2008 |
2009 |
INC / DEC |
% |
|
SOURCES OF FUNDS: |
||||
|
1.SHAREHOLDERS FUND |
|
|
|
|
|
A.
Reserves and surplus |
924853467 |
1170316598 |
(+)245463131 |
(+)26.54 |
|
Less:
I O G |
667117341 |
1001635816 |
(+)334518475 |
(+)50.14 |
|
Total |
257736126 |
168680782 |
(-)89055344 |
(-)34.55 |
|
2.LOANS FUNDS |
|
|
|
|
|
A.
Secured Loans |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
B.
Unsecured Loans |
524724554 |
459481554 |
(-)65243000 |
(-)12.43 |
|
3.DEFERRED TAX LIABILITY |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Total
Loans fund |
524724554 |
459481554 |
(-)65243000 |
(-)12.43 |
|
TOTAL |
782460680 |
628162336 |
(-)154298344 |
(-)19.71 |
|
APPLICATION OF FUNDS |
||||
|
1.FIXED ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
A.
Grass Block |
670717131 |
684249466 |
(+)13532335 |
(+)02.02 |
|
B.
Less: Depreciation |
448163935 |
461824557 |
(+)13660622 |
(+)03.04 |
|
C.
Net Block |
2225533196 |
222424909 |
(-)128287 |
(-)00.06 |
|
D.
Capital work-in-progress |
35904882 |
32379422 |
(-)3525460 |
(-)09.82 |
|
Total Fixed Assets |
258458078 |
254804331 |
(-)3653747 |
(-)01.41 |
|
2.CURRENT ASSETS, LOANS AND ADVANCES |
|
|
|
|
|
A.
Inventories |
122128776 |
132990382 |
(+)10861606 |
(+)08.89 |
|
B.
Sundry Debtors |
429647827 |
370407288 |
(-)59240539 |
(-)13.79 |
|
C.
Cash and Bank balance |
120426620 |
21216217 |
(-)99210403 |
(-)82.38 |
|
D.
Loan and Advance |
113997847 |
107233324 |
(-)6764523 |
(-)05.93 |
|
E. Other
Current Assets |
0 |
3572580 |
(+)3572585 |
(+)100.00 |
|
Total Current Assets |
786201070 |
635419796 |
(-)150781274 |
(-)19.17 |
|
Less:
Total Current Liabilities and Provision |
262327735 |
262075978 |
(-)251757 |
(-)00.09 |
|
Total |
523873335 |
373343818 |
(-)150529517 |
(-)28.73 |
|
3. Outstanding
Expenses (miscellany exp) |
129267 |
14187 |
(-)115080 |
(-)89.02 |
|
TOTAL |
782460680 |
628162336 |
(-)154298344 |
(-)19.71 |
Comparative Balance Sheet as on 31st March 2009-2010
|
PARTICULARS |
2009 |
2010 |
INC / DEC |
% |
|
SOURCES OF FUNDS: |
||||
|
1.SHAREHOLDERS FUND |
|
|
|
|
|
A. Reserves
and surplus |
1170316598 |
1249344881 |
(+)79028283 |
(+)06.75 |
|
Less:
I O G |
1001635816 |
1248675113 |
(+)247039297 |
(+)24.66 |
|
Total |
168680782 |
669768 |
(-)168011014 |
(-)99.60 |
|
2.LOANS FUNDS |
|
|
|
|
|
A.
Secured Loans |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
B.
Unsecured Loans |
459481554 |
0 |
(-)459481554 |
0 |
|
3.DEFERRED TAX LIABILITY |
0 |
381952554 |
(+)381952554 |
0 |
|
Total
Loans fund |
459481554 |
381952554 |
(-)77529000 |
(-)16.87 |
|
TOTAL |
628162336 |
382622322 |
(-)245540014 |
(-)39.08 |
|
APPLICATION OF FUNDS |
||||
|
1.FIXED ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
A.
Grass Block |
684249466 |
697208837 |
(+)12959371 |
(+)01.89 |
|
B.
Less: Depreciation |
461824557 |
476028220 |
(+)14203663 |
(+)03.08 |
|
C.
Net Block |
222424909 |
221180617 |
(+)1244292 |
(+)00.55 |
|
D.
Capital work-in-progress |
32379422 |
32470197 |
(+)90775 |
(+)00.28 |
|
Total Fixed Assets |
254804331 |
253650814 |
(-)1153517 |
(-)00.45 |
|
2.CURRENT ASSETS, LOANS AND ADVANCES |
|
|
|
|
|
A.
Inventories |
132990382 |
116629901 |
(-)16360481 |
(-)12.30 |
|
B.
Sundry Debtors |
370407288 |
202028944 |
(-)168378344 |
(-)45.45 |
|
C.
Cash and Bank balance |
21216217 |
85689873 |
(+)64473656 |
(+)303.88 |
|
D.
Loan and Advance |
107233324 |
110392600 |
(+)3159276 |
(+)02.94 |
|
E.
Other Current Assets |
3572580 |
2970921 |
(-)601664 |
(-)16.84 |
|
Total Current Assets |
635419796 |
517712239 |
(-)117707557 |
(-)18.52 |
|
Less:
Total Current Liabilities and Provision |
262075978 |
388740731 |
(+)126664753 |
(+)48.33 |
|
Total |
373343818 |
128971508 |
(+)244372310 |
(-)65.46 |
|
3.
Outstanding Expenses (miscellany exp) |
14187 |
0 |
(-)14187 |
0 |
|
TOTAL |
628162336 |
382622322 |
(-)245540014 |
(-)39.08 |
Comparative Balance Sheet as on 31st March 2010-2011
|
PARTICULARS |
2010 |
2011 |
INC / DEC |
% |
|
SOURCES OF FUNDS: |
||||
|
1.SHAREHOLDERS FUND |
|
|
|
|
|
A.
Reserves and surplus |
1249344881 |
1542279274.35 |
292934393 |
(+)23.44 |
|
Less:
I O G |
1248675113 |
(-)1351823208.50 |
103148095 |
(+)8.26 |
|
Total |
669768 |
190456066 |
189786298 |
0 |
|
2.LOANS FUNDS |
|
|
|
|
|
A.
Secured Loans |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
B.
Unsecured Loans |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
3.DEFERRED TAX LIABILITY |
381952554 |
36709354 |
(-)65243200 |
(-)17.00 |
|
Total
Loans fund |
381952554 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
TOTAL |
382622322 |
507165420 |
124543098 |
(+)32.00 |
|
APPLICATION OF FUNDS |
||||
|
1.FIXED ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
A.
Grass Block |
697208837 |
710845700.51 |
136368635 |
(+)19.00 |
|
B. Less:
Depreciation |
476028220 |
490606642.51 |
145784225 |
(+)30.00 |
|
C.
Net Block |
221180617 |
220239058 |
(-)941559 |
(-)00.42 |
|
D.
Capital work-in-progress |
32470197 |
39573984.34 |
7103787.34 |
(+)21.00 |
|
Total
Fixed Assets |
253650814 |
259813042.34 |
6162229.3 |
(+)2.00 |
|
2.CURRENT ASSETS, LOANS AND ADVANCES |
|
|
|
|
|
A.
Inventories |
116629901 |
126372939.59 |
9743038.5 |
(+)08.00 |
|
B.
Sundry Debtors |
202028944 |
392839056.52 |
190810112.5 |
(+)94.00 |
|
C.
Cash and Bank balance |
85689873 |
29204812.69 |
(-)56485060.31 |
(-)65.00 |
|
D.
Loan and Advance |
110392600 |
119740222.69 |
6376701.6 |
(+)05.00 |
|
E.
Other Current Assets |
2970921 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Total
Current Assets |
517712239 |
668157031.3 |
150444792.3 |
(+)29.00 |
|
Less:
Total Current Liabilities and Provision |
388740731 |
420804653.98 |
32063922.9 |
(+)08.00 |
|
Total |
128971508 |
247352377.4 |
118380869.4 |
(+)91.00 |
FINDINGS:
1. During 2006 – 2007, the Reserve and Surplus
maintained was very high (52.50%).
Normally, it was analyzed that Reserve and Surplus maintained in the
factory showed an increasing trend during the past 5 Years.
2. During the year 2007 – 2008, the government
contribution was more (i.e.) 50.14% as compared to the other respective
years. Finally it was found that Income
of Government maintained in the concern showed an increasing trend during the
past 5 Years.
3. During the Comparative Year 2006 – 2007 Loan
amount availed by the concern showed the decreasing trend which was about
(-46.92%). During the following years,
Loan amount was not availed by the concern for its future operations.
4. During the Comparative Year 2008 – 2009, the
Loan amount availed by the concern showed the decreasing trend which was
about (-12.43%). During the following of proceeding Years,
Loan was not obtained by the concern for its future operations.
5. During the Comparative Year 2010 – 2011,
the deferred Tax Liability to be paid by the concern showed an decreasing trend
which was about (-17%). During the preceding years, the company had
no Taxable amount to pay for its further proceedings.
6. During the year 2008 – 2009, it was too low
which was about (-00.09%) as compared
to the following years. Normally, the
Current Liability and Provision had fluctuations over a period of past 5 Years.
7. During the period 2006 – 2007, the stock
position maintained by the concern was very low which was about (-13.67%). Gradually, stock position maintained in the
concern showed an increasing trend during the past 5 Years.
8. During the year 2010 – 2011, the sum amount
received on Credit by the concern was very high (94%) as compared to the
preceding years. Normally, it showed a
decreasing trend during the past preceding years.
9. During the year 2009 – 2010, the cash
balance maintained by the concern was very high (i.e., 303.88%). During the year 2007 – 2008, the Cash &
Bank balance maintained was too low (i.e., 10.59%) as compared to the
respective 5 Years. As Majority it
showed an increasing trend during the past 5 Years.
10. During
the year 2006 – 2007, the Loans & Advances received by the concern was high
(i.e., 31.64%) as compared to the following Years. During the year 2008 – 2009, the Advances
received by the company were too low (i.e., 05.93%). As Majority the Loans and Advances received during
the past 5 Years showed an increasing trend.
11. During the year 2006 – 2007, the other Current
Assets maintained in the TANCEM Limited., was High (i.e., 23.97%) as compared
to other respective years. During the
year 2009 – 2010, the other Current Assets maintained was very Low (i.e.,
16.84%).
12. During
the year 2010 – 2011, the Fixed Assets maintained by the concern was very High
(i.e., 19%) as compared to the preceding years.
During the year 2006 – 2007, it was very Low (i.e., -1.55%) as compared
to other respective years. Normally,
Fixed Assets showed an increasing trend over the past 5 Years.
13. During the year 2010 – 2011, Depreciation was
charged high which was about (30%) as compared to other years. During the year 2006 – 2007, the
depreciation, it was Low (00.99%) as compared to other year. Normally, depreciation was charged & it
showed an increasing trend over the past 5 Years.
14. During the 2007 – 2008, the Capital amount
Invested was very High (i.e., 30.59%) to carry out its operations as compared
to the other respective years. During the
year 2008 – 2009, the Capital amount Invested was (09.82%) which was very low
as compared to other years. As majority
it showed an increasing trend during the past 5 Years.
15. The Net Assets maintained by the concern
during the past five years was very Low (i.e., -00.56% to 05.69%). Gradually it showed a decreasing trend over
the past 5 Years.
16. During the period 2006 – 2007, the Outstanding
Expenses incurred by the company was very Low (-61.50%) as compared to other
respective years. Gradually, it showed a
decreasing trend over the period of 5 Years.
SUGGESTIONS:
Ø TANCEM is a strong competitor in
manufacturing and supplying a wide range of cement products. The corporate image of TANCEM is to be
maintained ever to sustain in this competitive arena. To become world class
Energy Company, utmost care is taken to produce quality products in order to
capture in the competitive market.
Ø The company has to adopt
advanced technology in order to increase more production.
Ø Maintenance of Fixed Assets is
necessary to avoid abnormal wear and tear.
Ø To widen its market, more
Services are required. The company has
to extend its services not only to the confirmed area. But also to the areas which are out of reach
by the TANCEM Limited., to increase its sales potential.
Ø Consumer is the king of the
market. So, in order to with stand in
the market, Consumers are to be satisfied proper care is to be taken to satisfy
the needs of the consumers.
Ø The company should declare more
Dividends to the Share Holders in order to increase market value of Shares of
TANCEM in the security market to maintain its Goodwill.
Ø Different varieties of Brands
should be introduced according to the need of the customers, So as to earn more
profit in future
CONCLUSION:
TANCEM Limited plays a predominant role in
production of Cement in Ariyalur District. It caters the needs of the public as well as
private sector with the quality products and its excellent services according
to the preference of the customers. The
Researcher has found that the comparative study of Balance Sheet made during
the past five years was found satisfactory.
Utmost care is taken to increase the Fixed Assets of the company, in
turn to decrease the Liability of the concern.
The stock position maintained in the company was very Good. It leads to increase the production over the
years and it leads to increases more profits in future.
REFERENCES:
1.
T. S. Reddy, Y. Hari
Prasad Reddy “Management Accounting”
Chennai, Maragham Publication, Third Edition (2007).
2.
R. S. N. Pillai
and Bagavathi “Management
Accounting” S. Chand Company Limited.
Publication, New Delhi, 3rd Edition (2006).
3.
I. M. Pandey “Financial Management” New Delhi, Vikas Publications, Ninth Edition (2007).
4.
C. R. Kothari, “Research Methodology Methods and Techniques” Wishwa
Prakasham, New Delhi (2002).
5.
Jelsy Joseph
Kuppapally “Accounting
for Managers” Prentice Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi, (2008).
Received on 10.02.2014 Modified on 12.03.2014
Accepted on 21.04.2014 © A&V Publication all right reserved
Asian J. Management 5(3):
July-September, 2014 page 286-292